<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Georgia Appeals Digest</title>
    <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/</link>
    <description>Newly published automated summaries of covered Georgia Court of Appeals civil decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Tony L. Ware v. Fidelity Acceptance Corp. N/K/A Wells Fargo Financial, LLC D/B/A Wells Fargo Usa Holdings</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0662/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0662/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed Tony L. Ware&#x27;s application for discretionary review because he failed to comply with the required interlocutory appeal procedures. The Georgia Court of Appeals held that compliance with these requirements is mandatory and does not excuse a party from following them when seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tony L. Ware v. Fidelity Acceptance Corporation</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a27a0097/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a27a0097/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue was whether Tony Ware could appeal trial court orders correcting clerical errors and setting a briefing schedule after obtaining a default judgment. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because the orders did not grant or deny relief under relevant statutes, depriving the court of jurisdiction.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gregory King v. Aniyah Jackson</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0650/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0650/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>Gregory King applied for discretionary review of a trial court&#x27;s protective order against him based on stalking under OCGA § 16-5-94. The Georgia Court of Appeals granted the application because the lower court&#x27;s order is directly appealable, as it does not arise from a domestic relations matter subject to other discretionary procedures.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amanda Branch v. Ram Partners, LLC A/A/F Sutter Lake</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0635/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0635/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue was whether Amanda Branch could seek discretionary review of a magistrate court judgment after failing to meet filing deadlines for her applications. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the application because it was untimely filed more than seven days after the entry of the magistrate court&#x27;s judgment.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Derrickson &amp; Associates, LLC, et al. v. Strategic Funding Source, Inc.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0639/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0639/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved a discretionary appeal filed by DERRICKSON &amp; ASSOCIATES, LLC concerning the case against STRATEGIC FUNDING SOURCE, INC. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the application for discretionary appeal in this matter.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Laborian Williams v. Brina Investments, Inc.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0640/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0640/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved Laborian Williams&#x27; application for discretionary appeal from a magistrate court judgment regarding a writ of possession, which lacked jurisdiction because it had not been reviewed by a state or superior court. The Georgia Court of Appeals transferred the case to the Magistrate Court of Fulton County with direction to transmit it to the state or superior court for disposition.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regina Hammon v. Tah Operations-Tah Georgia LLC</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0666/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0666/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved whether the Georgia Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to review a Magistrate Court order granting a writ of possession. The Georgia Court of Appeals transferred the case because it lacked jurisdiction, directing the filing to be transmitted to the state or superior court for disposition.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Woodland Grove Limited Partnership R6139 061 v. Gwinnett County Board Of Tax Assessors</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26i0267/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26i0267/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved an application for interlocutory appeal concerning a tax assessment matter between Woodland Grove Limited Partnership and Gwinnett County Board of Tax Assessors. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the Application for Interlocutory Appeal in its disposition on July 31, 2026.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William Hart v. Jennifer Burtner-Chan</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2291/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2291/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved whether William Hart had jurisdiction to appeal a state court judgment following a magistrate court decision without first filing an application for discretionary review. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the case because Hart failed to follow the required procedural steps for such an appeal, depriving the court of jurisdiction.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In The Interest Of D. W. K., A Child (Mother)</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0636/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0636/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved a discretionary appeal application concerning the case in the interest of D. W. K., a child (mother). The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the application for discretionary appeal.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In The Interest Of L. R. D., A Child (Mother)</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0637/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0637/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved an application for a discretionary appeal concerning the interest of L. R. D., a child (mother). The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the Application for Discretionary Appeal in its disposition.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robert Curtis Miller Jr et al. v. Troy Paul Williams</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a27e0005/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a27e0005/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved an emergency motion seeking various relief related to dispossessory orders, specifically concerning payment requirements under OCGA § 44-7-56(b)(5). The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the emergency motion because Miller et al. failed to show payment and did not meet the requirements for exercising Rule 40(b) powers.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Re: Estate Of Freddie Wright, Deceased</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2343/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2343/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved whether the appellant should withdraw an appeal or application in a probate matter. The Georgia Court of Appeals granted the appellant&#x27;s motion to withdraw the appeal/application, releasing jurisdiction back to the trial court.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Geoffrey Graham White v. Charlie Daniel White, Executor Of The Estate Of Charles Louis White, Deceased et al.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0633/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0633/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved a discretionary appeal filed by Geoffrey Graham White against Charlie Daniel White regarding an estate matter. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the application for discretionary appeal in this case.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Jennifer Burnett et al.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26i0266/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26i0266/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved an application for interlocutory appeal in a case between Jane Doe and Jennifer Burnett. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the application for interlocutory appeal.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Aeisha Durand v. Ch Realty X-Penler Mf Atl - Eleven 85, LLC</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a27d0013/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a27d0013/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A27D0013. AEISHA DURAND v.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Edward Oles v. American Court Reporting Company, Inc.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a1156/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a1156/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>David Edward Oles appealed a trial court order granting summary judgment for $2,480.35 against American Court Reporting Company, Inc., seeking to appeal based on the grant of that motion. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed Oles&#x27;s appeal because the amount in dispute was under ten thousand dollars and he failed to follow the required discretionary appeal procedure.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In Re: Estate Of Tien Thi Davis, Deceased</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2519/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2519/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved whether an appeal to the Court of Appeals was timely filed after a probate court dismissed a caveat. The Georgia Court of Appeals held that because the appellant sought review too late, it lacked jurisdiction and therefore dismissed the matter.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William Haywood Gordon v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0620/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0620/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved William Haywood Gordon seeking discretionary review of a Gwinnett County Superior Court order denying his motion to set aside a dismissal against Wells Fargo Bank. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the discretionary application after considering Gordon&#x27;s supplemental brief.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sharna Mcclung v. Key Ndh LLC d/b/a Centra North Druid Hills</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0630/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0630/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved Sharna McClung&#x27;s attempt to seek discretionary review of a DeKalb County Magistrate Court consent judgment. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed her application for discretionary appeal because she waived appellate rights by entering the consent judgment and lacked jurisdiction due to prior rulings.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kelly Gallagher v. East Perimeter Pointe</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0647/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0647/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved Kelly Gallagher&#x27;s application for discretionary review of a magistrate court judgment granting possession, which raised questions about the Court of Appeals&#x27; jurisdiction over such an order. The Georgia Court of Appeals transferred the case to the state or superior court because it lacked jurisdiction and directed that those courts determine if Gallagher has perfected her right of appeal.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mountain Del Rey, LLC. v. Paul Wightman Lamb et al.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26i0268/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26i0268/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved a party seeking an interlocutory appeal in the case of Mountain Del Rey, LLC v. Paul Wightman Lamb et al. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the application for interlocutory appeal.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Taylor v. Argos Usa</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0621/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0621/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved a party&#x27;s application for discretionary appeal in the case of John Taylor v. Argos USA. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the application for discretionary appeal.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shakira Forde v. Hairston Property Holdings, LP d/b/a The Park At Carrigan</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a27d0004/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a27d0004/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved Shakira Forde&#x27;s application for discretionary review of a DeKalb County Magistrate Court judgment due to lack of jurisdiction. The Georgia Court of Appeals transferred the case because it lacked jurisdiction and directed the filing to be transmitted to the state or superior court for disposition.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Si Van Huynh v. Phuong Thi Huynh</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a1072/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a1072/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved whether an appeal from a denial of a motion to vacate a divorce decree was properly filed under discretionary review procedures. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because it lacked jurisdiction due to failure to file the required application and untimely filing of the notice of appeal.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indie Holdings, Inc. v. Candace G. Spencer</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2455/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2455/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>Indie Holdings, Inc. sought to garnish wages based on a bankruptcy exemption granted by the superior court. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the direct appeal because Indie was not entitled to one and the denial of its discretionary application was a decision on the merits.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kristian Meadows v. Alivia Allen</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0665/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0665/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved a discretionary appeal filed by Kristian Meadows against Alivia Allen concerning case number 26CV045. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the application for discretionary appeal after considering the matter.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prentice Green v. Capital One, N.A., Successor By Merger To Discover Bank</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2326/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2326/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved a dispute over credit card debt where the trial court had entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because the defendant failed to comply with the required discretionary review procedure for appeals under ten thousand dollars.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Herman L. Johnson v. Fun Spot America Of Atlanta, Inc.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2471/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2471/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved Herman L. Johnson appealing a trial court&#x27;s denial of a motion to set aside a judgment based on OCGA § 9-11-60(d). The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because it lacked jurisdiction due to procedural bars related to prior rulings and required discretionary review for the motion.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Homer P. Jordan Iv v. Alice Juneal Jordan</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0612/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0612/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved a discretionary appeal filed by Homer P. Jordan IV against a prior court decision. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the application for discretionary review in this case.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lizzie Nyame v. Echo Mill Neighborhood Association, Inc.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0619/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0619/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved a discretionary appeal filed by Lizzie Nyame against Echo Mill Neighborhood Association regarding a prior decision. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the application for discretionary appeal in this case.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wendy Elaine Hammack v. Ronnie L. Hammack, II</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0625/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0625/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved whether the application for discretionary appeal should be granted in the case of Hammack v. Hammack, II. The Georgia Court of Appeals granted the application for discretionary appeal and ordered the appellant to file a notice within ten days.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nichole Davis v. Pernell Ports Sr.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a27e0001/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a27e0001/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved an emergency motion filed by Nichole Davis seeking various relief, including a stay of eviction. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the emergency motion because its power to issue such orders must be exercised sparingly.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sharon Johnson et al. v. Scott Morgan et al.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0641/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26d0641/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved whether the application for discretionary appeal should be granted regarding the case of Johnson et al v. Morgan et al. The Georgia Court of Appeals granted the application for discretionary appeal in this matter, allowing the appellant to file a notice of appeal within ten days.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cindy Mairena-Perez et al.. v. Esperanza Ramirez Villalobos</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26i0259/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26i0259/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved a party&#x27;s request for an interlocutory appeal in the case of CINDY MAIRENA-PEREZ Et al. v. ESPERANZA RAMIREZ VILLALOBOS. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied the Application for Interlocutory Appeal.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oksana Dutchak v. The Reserve At Old Lost Mountain Community Association, Inc.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2336/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2336/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved Oksana Dutchak&#x27;s attempt to set aside unauthorized settlement orders after a trial court granted them, which was challenged via an appeal. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the case because the notice of appeal was filed too late and lacked jurisdiction due to improper procedural requirements.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kristian Meadows v. Alivia Allen</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2389/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2389/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved whether a direct appeal from a trial court family violence protective order was proper without first filing an application for discretionary review under OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(2). The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the case because the appellant failed to follow the required discretionary appeals procedure, which is jurisdictional.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mattie S. Childs, As Administrator Of The Estate Of Jesse C. Mays v. Lauren Williamson, County Administrator et al.</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2404/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2404/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved whether an appeal was timely filed following a trial court&#x27;s dismissal and subsequent denial of a motion for reconsideration. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the action because the notice of appeal was filed outside the required time limit, depriving the court of jurisdiction.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Joanna Brown v. Glenn Anderson</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2419/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2419/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved Joanna Brown appealing a jury award from an automobile accident case seeking to challenge a pre-trial order. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because Brown failed to comply with the required discretionary review procedure for actions involving damages under $10,000.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tomas E. Espinosa v. Jessica Maldonado Espinosa</title>
      <link>https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2457/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gaappealsdigest.com/cases/a26a2457/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The legal issue involved whether an appeal from a trial court&#x27;s dismissal of a contempt motion was properly filed under Georgia appellate procedure. The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the case because Espinosa failed to follow the required discretionary appeals procedure, which is jurisdictional for such matters.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
